COR-01
Sprint Corrections

DAY 2
CORRECTIONS.

Derek dogfooded Day 2 as ICP. Six corrections needed — two critical. LinkedIn approach is wrong. Quality gates are in the wrong place. Dependencies are missing.

Published Feb 20, 2026
Source Day 3 Meeting
Severity 2 Critical, 2 High, 1 Medium
6
Total Corrections
2
Critical
4h+
Time Wasted (Cold Outreach)
C1
REWRITE LINKEDIN OUTREACH
Critical
Day 2 Currently Says
Search for 50 ICP profiles on LinkedIn. Craft personalized connection message for each. Send connection request + intro message. Track responses in connection tracker.
Should Say
Use Perplexity Deep Research to find 50 ICP-matching LinkedIn profiles. Go to each profile and click Connect — NO message. Just connect. Move on. 50 connects should take <30 minutes. Save messaging for warm outreach in a separate tool.
"I'd be blown away if any of these people responded." — Derek, after spending 4+ hours on cold outreach with custom messages Derek Kaschak — Day 3 meeting, 45:07
Why this matters: Cold outreach + personalized message is the traditional approach but yields ~0.5% response rate. It's not asymmetric leverage. The new approach: build audience first (connect), then attract via content (hand-raising posts). People who accept your connection see your posts organically. Those who engage with your content are self-identifying as potential customers. This is pull vs push.
Tools to update:
  • 1.Connection Message Generator → remove from Day 2 LinkedIn step (move to Day 3+ warm outreach)
  • 2.Add Perplexity Deep Research prompt: "Find 50 [ICP description] on LinkedIn who have been active in the last week"
  • 3.Connection tracker: add "cold" vs "warm" column to differentiate strategies
C2
ADD HAND-RAISING FRAMEWORK
Critical
Day 3 Currently Says
Create and post hand-raising content. Generate 5 hand-raising post drafts. No framework for what "hand-raising" means or how to execute.
Should Include
Full agitation framework: identify ICP pain points from research, write from perspective of someone WITH the problem (not selling the solution), ask open-ended questions, use video OR text. Include algorithm hack instructions and engagement coordination plan.
Agitation Framework to add:
  • A.Identify pain: Pull from ICP pain language extractor output. What genuinely frustrates you about [your ICP's problem]?
  • B.Write authentically: "Man, there's so much noise on AI. How do you guys sort through the signal?" — not a pitch, just a real question.
  • C.Choose format: Quick video on phone (30-60 sec) OR text post. Video is higher engagement but text is faster to iterate.
  • D.Algorithm hack: Coordinate 2-3 people to comment within 59 minutes of posting. Can't be the same people every time. More early engagement = wider distribution.
  • E.Measure: Target 40 engagements. 3+ "me too" = strong signal. 5+ "how?" = hot leads. If 20+ engagements by end of Day 3, proceed to Day 4.
  • F.No pitch: No mention of product/service. No CTA. Put signup link in bio only. The sell comes naturally from ongoing conversation.
"The intent here is to get conversation. We're not trying to sell anything. We're trying to agitate the pain point that our product is the solution for." Jason — Day 3 meeting, 46:03
C3
ADD PRE-SPRINT DEPENDENCIES
High
Problem: Day 2 assumes users already have active accounts on all required platforms. Derek spent 20 minutes just creating a Reddit account. Without Sales Navigator, LinkedIn took 4x longer.
Add to pre-sprint checklist (before Day 1):
  • REQLinkedIn account — active, profile updated, professional photo. If brand new, warm it up for 3-5 days first.
  • RECLinkedIn Sales Navigator — dramatically reduces ICP search time. Free trial available. Without it, expect 4x the time on outreach steps.
  • REQReddit account — at least 3 days old (many subreddits restrict new accounts). Join 3-5 ICP-relevant communities.
  • REQPerplexity account — for Deep Research ICP profiling. Free tier works but Pro gives better results.
  • RECAI tool of choice — Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini. Needed for prompt-based tools throughout sprint.
  • RECGoogle Sheets access — for connection tracker and sprint dashboard.
"If I hadn't upgraded to Sales Navigator, it realistically could have taken 4 hours. I was pretty blown away by the difference between the two." Derek Kaschak — Day 3 meeting, 14:36
C4
MOVE QUALITY GATES INLINE
Medium
Current Layout
Step 1 → Step 2 → Step 3 → ... → Quality Gates section (at bottom)
Corrected Layout
Step 1 [Quality Gate tab] → Step 2 [Quality Gate tab] → Step 3 [Quality Gate tab]
Implementation: Add a collapsible "Quality Gate" tab directly under each step. User completes the step, expands the gate, checks their work, keeps scrolling. No need to jump to a separate section. This reduces cognitive load and prevents users from skipping gates entirely.
"The quality gates — I think it makes sense to have this as a tab under the actual step. Cool, I did this, my quality gate is right here, I keep scrolling." Derek Kaschak — Day 3 meeting, 01:05:10
C5
PERSONALIZE TOOLS
High
Problem: The connection message generator and content tools don't know who the user is. Derek's positioning is different from Will's. A one-size-fits-all message feels generic and hurts authority positioning.
Fix: Add a "personal context" input to key tools:
  • 1.Connection Message Generator: Input = LinkedIn bio/profile + ICP pain language + specific subject. Output = message that sounds like the user, not a template.
  • 2.Hand-Raising Post Creator: Input = user's real frustrations + ICP research + voice/tone preference. Output = authentic post that doesn't feel scripted.
  • 3.Comment/Reply Helper: Input = user context + thread context + ICP pain language. Output = valuable comment that builds authority without pitching.
"The idea would be this process getting a little more familiar with you — the ICP, our client — in the beginning. Just a little extraction of who they are." Derek Kaschak — Day 3 meeting, 01:15:00
C6
ADD RECONCILIATION DAYS
High
Problem: The sprint is structured as a linear Day 1 → Day 2 → Day 3 progression. If Day 2 has issues (like a fundamentally wrong LinkedIn approach), users keep building on a faulty foundation because there's no built-in pause to assess.
New cadence:
  • D1-3Execute foundation days (ICP, outreach, content)
  • D3.5RECONCILIATION DAY: Review what worked, what didn't, what needs correcting. Update tools and pages. Don't advance until foundation is solid.
  • D4-7Execute engagement + nurture days
  • D7.5RECONCILIATION DAY: Mid-sprint review. Assess pipeline, adjust strategy, update content.
  • D8-14Execute conversion + close days
"There's no point of stacking on faulty foundation. When we do these 14-day sprints, we have to modify them to have every 3 or 4 days a catch-up, or pause, or reconcile day." Jason — Day 3 meeting, 20:29 & 51:38